Color-Performance, Brightness Comparison and Power Consumption
At 263 nits, the PG27AQDP can still be seen very well during the day with plenty of light in the room. The brightness range extends up to 30 nits and should also be sufficiently dark for the late hours. In my opinion, the 263 nits are easily sufficient for an OLED monitor, but it should also be noted that LCD monitors have their strengths here. If you compare the color accuracy in the factory settings with regard to sRGB, then you should definitely activate the sRGB color space mode in the OSD if necessary, otherwise you will be working for the wastebasket if in doubt.
Brightness
Gray Scale, Saturation and ColorChecker
Power Consumption
Yes, one of the annoying OLED issues is and remains power consumption, even if OLEDs are getting better and better, they can’t keep up with simple LCDs. But the simple LCDs can’t do HDR either. If you compare the values with an IPS mini-LED, you will see that an OLED can even be more energy efficient.
Here is a comparison with the KTC M27P20, which can of course easily deliver 1100 nits in HDR at 100 percent APL. What I’m trying to say is that if you want a lot of brightness, you shouldn’t expect it to be possible with 23 watts.
In everyday use, the PG27AQDP is slightly more economical than the KTC with its mini-LED FALD backlight – especially when idle. After all!
- 1 - Introduction, Features and Specs
- 2 - Workmanship and Details
- 3 - How we measure: Equipment and Methods
- 4 - Pixel Response Times
- 5 - Display Latencies
- 6 - Color-Performance @ Default Settings
- 7 - Direct Comparison and Power Consumption
- 8 - Color-Performance calibrated
- 9 - HDR-Performance
- 10 - Summary and Conclusion
17 Antworten
Kommentar
Lade neue Kommentare
Veteran
Mitglied
Moderator
Mitglied
Moderator
Urgestein
Moderator
Urgestein
Mitglied
Neuling
Neuling
Neuling
Mitglied
Neuling
Neuling
Moderator
Neuling
Alle Kommentare lesen unter igor´sLAB Community →