Pixel response times, Latencies and Power Consumption
The MX25AQ will certainly not break any records, as it can neither boast a high refresh rate nor an OLED panel. Nevertheless, the response times of the pixels are quite decent, which is no challenge at only 60 Hz. After all, the 5 ms (according to the manufacturer) is not as unrealistic as the famous one millisecond that is currently promised for LCD panels. Overshoot can be noticed, but it is definitely not annoying.
Another note at this point: I have only looked at the default overdrive “Trace Free 60”.
Latencies
The latencies show that the MX25AQ was and is not an e-sports monitor, but rather an office monitor for hobby gamers. Processing is quite fast at less than a millisecond, but the refresh lag takes around 8 ms. Compared to current 60 Hz monitors, however, the MX24AQ is still far from being an old hand. The ASUS VA24ECE is only marginally faster because it offers 75 Hz. In other words, if you’re gaming on a 60/75 Hz monitor, you shouldn’t expect miracles.
In terms of power consumption, not much has really changed in recent years. Because today’s “small” monitors don’t need any more or less power. At least when it comes to LCD panels without mini LEDs (FALD).
Important: If you want to compare this, it is best to use the power consumption at 100 percent white window @ D65, 200 nits. This will at least give you some comparability. Yes, you still have to keep the panel technology, size etc. in mind.







































16 Antworten
Kommentar
Lade neue Kommentare
Veteran
Urgestein
Mitglied
Moderator
Veteran
Mitglied
Urgestein
Veteran
Mitglied
Veteran
Mitglied
Moderator
Veteran
Mitglied
Mitglied
Mitglied
Alle Kommentare lesen unter igor´sLAB Community →