Thermal-Paste Details

< Back to Overview

Paste Dow Chemical DOWSIL TC-5888 (2025, China)

Product Images

General Information

Manufacturer
Dow Chemical
Designation
DOWSIL TC-5888 (2025, China)

Manufacturer Specifications

Bulk Thermal Conductivity λ
5.2
Accessories
None
Container
Cartridge
Container
Cartridge

Notes and Recommendations

CPU
GPU
Difficulty

Measurements

Thermal Conductivity (W/m·K)
5.3
Min BLT
17
Interface Resistance
4.4
Heat Conducting Particles and Matrix
Al203, ZnO, Silicone-free
Particle Size
1 to 16 µm

Material Testing and TIMA Protocol (on request)

Microscopy and Particles

Measurement Process



Thermal Resistances Rth

Let's start with the most important aspect, the thermal resistance Rth. The key feature of Rth is that it correlates linearly with the layer thickness, while thermal conductivity follows a different curve and is far from linear. But experienced readers already know this. We are mainly interested in layer thicknesses of 200 µm or less for CPUs, and usually 100 µm or much thinner for GPUs, depending on bending.

I have now prepared a bar chart comparing the relevant layer thicknesses from 50 to 400 µm for Rth.

Minimum Possible Layer Thickness

That's exactly why I wanted to see how far we could go with a bit of pressure and how much a paste can still be compressed. Here, I use the usual 9N pro cm², which is more than sufficient and higher than what, for instance, a GPU cooler would achieve.

Effective Thermal Conductivity and Cooling Simulation

As is always the case in my other reviews: once you have Rth, λeff (effective thermal conductivity) is not really needed. We can also see how the values change across BLT (Bond Line Thickness), though we can't expect a linear curve anymore due to the included area and BLT.

I have now prepared a bar chart comparing the relevant layer thicknesses from 50 to 400 µm for λeff.

CPUs with Heatspreader

CPUs without Headspreader / Direct Die

GPUs

Werbung

Werbung