Latest news

Intel Nova Lake in desktop focus, up to 52 cores and extremely large cache planned for 2026

Intel is planning a new desktop generation for 2026 with the Core Ultra 400 series, internally referred to as Nova Lake, which is intended to clearly differentiate itself from Arrow Lake and Arrow Lake Refresh. According to current international reports and technical leaks, Intel is pursuing an approach that relies on both a very high number of cores and an exceptionally large cache structure. This information has not yet been officially confirmed, which is why it cannot be considered verified.

In the desktop segment, the Core Ultra 400 processors are to be positioned as a genuine next-gen platform. After Arrow Lake-S and Arrow Lake Refresh, which continue to rely on hybrid architectures with performance and efficiency cores, Nova Lake is intended to expand this approach further. The aim is apparently to address more performance-oriented desktop systems again without abandoning the mobile product strategy. Accordingly, Nova Lake is to be made available for both desktop PCs and high-performance mobile versions.

The technical specifications of the presumed top-of-the-range Core Ultra 9 485K model are particularly striking. According to leaks, this model is to be equipped with a total of 52 physical processor cores. The configuration therefore includes 16 performance cores, 32 efficiency cores and an additional 4 low-power efficiency cores. Hyper-Threading is still not to be used. Due to the high number of cores, an increase in the standard TDP from the previous 125 watts to around 150 watts is mentioned, which seems plausible in view of the architecture, but has not been officially confirmed.

A central feature of the Core Ultra 400 series is the so-called Big Last Level Cache. For the Core Ultra 9 models, up to 288 MiByte of additional cache is mentioned, which is to be made up of two compute tiles with 144 MiByte each. The Core Ultra 7 models, on the other hand, will only use a single compute tile and will therefore be equipped with 144 MiByte bLLC. According to several international observers, this cache strategy is aimed in particular at latency-critical applications and games. A direct technical comparison with similar concepts from other manufacturers is currently not possible.

Architecturally, Nova Lake will again introduce new CPU cores. The performance cores are called Panther Cove, while the new efficiency cores are codenamed Arctic Wolf. A platform change is planned at the same time. LGA-1954 is named as the socket, which will only support DDR5 memory. When equipped with one memory module per channel, transfer rates of up to 8,000 MT/s are promised. Whether these values can be achieved stably in everyday use cannot be verified at present.

In the competitive environment, Nova Lake is likely to encounter upcoming desktop processors from AMD, which are to be based on the Zen 6 architecture. According to current information, a maximum of 24 cores are expected there, possibly supplemented by additional efficient cores. A realistic performance comparison is not possible at this time, as no final specifications or independent benchmarks are available. According to current estimates, the direct clash of the platforms will not take place until the end of 2026 at the earliest.

Initial indications have also emerged regarding the integrated graphics. Linux kernel patches mention both Xe-3 and Xe-3P graphics architectures for Nova Lake. This information comes from publicly available source code changes and has been picked up by several international specialist media. There are also reports of very extensive PCIe and USB functions, although specific technical details have not yet been officially confirmed.

Overall, the unconfirmed information known so far paints a picture of a very ambitious desktop platform with which Intel wants to set new standards in the high-end segment. The combination of an extremely high number of cores and a large additional cache would represent a clear strategic realignment. However, a reliable assessment is only possible after an official presentation by Intel, as all core data is currently based on leaks and preliminary information.

Conclusion



The information known so far about Nova Lake paints a picture of a very ambitious desktop platform with which Intel wants to set new standards in the high-end segment in 2026. The combination of an extremely high number of cores and a large additional cache in particular clearly sets it apart from previous generations. As all key technical data is currently based on leaks and preliminary information, the actual benefits for gamers and other users cannot yet be reliably assessed. A well-founded assessment will only be possible after the official launch and independent tests.

Source Key statement Link
Intel Official roadmap information on the upcoming client CPU generation and confirmation of Nova Lake for the desktop from 2026 https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/newsroom/news/intel-client-computing-roadmap.html
Haze2K1 Leak on Core Ultra 400 models with up to 52 processor cores and up to 288 MiByte Big Last Level Cache https://x.com/Haze2K1/status/2001298954365858135
Phoronix Analysis of Linux kernel patches with references to Nova Lake, Xe-3 and Xe-3P graphics architectures and new instruction formats https://www.phoronix.com/news/Intel-Nova-Lake-Xe3-Linux

Kommentar

Lade neue Kommentare

RX480

Urgestein

2,151 Kommentare 1,041 Likes

Der Kleine mit 8P+12e+4lpe wird mir sicherlich fürs spielen reichen.
Sind das dann 125/2 Watt?

Ist schon Was über den Node bekannt, mit dem die einzelnen Teile gefertigt werden, alle mit 18A ?
(oder gibts wieder Unterschiede zw. P und E cores)

Antwort 1 Like

Tronado

Urgestein

5,503 Kommentare 3,115 Likes

Dann gibt es endlich mal was Neues zum Basteln. Und nicht mehr nur Tests hässlicher Tastaturen. :)

Antwort Gefällt mir

Homerclon

Veteran

221 Kommentare 135 Likes

Davon würde ich nicht ausgehen.
Der 245K hat ja ebenso wie der 285K eine TDP von 125W, obwohl dieser 10 Kerne (2P-, 8E-Kerne) weniger hat.
Oder anders: Zieht man die non-K-Modelle als Vergleich heran, dann liegt deren TDP immer bei 65W, egal ob 10 oder 24 Kerne.

Aber es ist nicht unwahrscheinlich, das der 24-Kerner ggü. 52-Kerne mit einer etwas niedrigeren TDP daher kommt. Behält vielleicht die 125W, während der Große auf die kolportierten 150W rauf geht.

Allerdings ist die TDP (bzw. PBP) doch eh uninteressant, da doch der MTP (ehem. PL2) meist viel höher liegt, und auch dauerhaft anliegen darf.

Antwort 1 Like

Danke für die Spende



Du fandest, der Beitrag war interessant und möchtest uns unterstützen? Klasse!

Hier erfährst Du, wie: Hier spenden.

Hier kannst Du per PayPal spenden.

About the author

Karsten Rabeneck-Ketme

Werbung

Werbung